Our Location
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
La parte 1 del C2 Proficiency: el multiple choice cloze, con lo que de verdad se examina (registro, expresiones hechas y matiz) y un ejercicio con soluciones explicadas.
La parte 1 del C2 parece la del C1, pero no lo es. Aquí las cuatro opciones suelen ser palabras que existen y encajan gramaticalmente. Lo que decide es el matiz, el registro o que la palabra forme parte de una expresión hecha.
| Tipo | Ejemplo | Cómo se reconoce |
|---|---|---|
| Expresión hecha | bear in mind, take for granted | Las otras tres opciones son sinónimos que nunca aparecen en esa expresión. |
| Registro | purchase frente a buy | El texto es formal o irónico y solo una opción encaja en ese tono. |
| Matiz de intensidad | concerned, alarmed, terrified | Todas significan lo mismo con distinta fuerza; el contexto marca cuánta. |
| Colocación poco frecuente | a marked improvement | La combinación es fija aunque no sea la que se te ocurre primero. |
El método cambia respecto al C1: aquí no sirve pensar qué palabra pondrías tú, porque probablemente pondrías la más común y la respuesta suele ser la menos común. Lee la frase entera, decide el tono, y descarta las que suenen demasiado neutras.
Ocho preguntas de nivel C2.
Elige la palabra que encaja en cada hueco.
On the difficulty of describing a smell
Of all the senses, smell is the one that language handles worst. English has a rich vocabulary for what things look like and a serviceable one for how they sound, but when it (1) to describing an odour, most speakers fall back on comparison: it smells like rain, like a hospital, like my grandmother house.
This is not a (2) of English in particular. Studies across dozens of languages have found the same pattern, with a handful of striking (3) . Speakers of certain languages of the Malay Peninsula have a set of abstract smell terms that behave much like colour words, and they use them with a (4) that European speakers cannot match.
What remains in (5) is why. One camp holds that the vocabulary follows the culture: where smell matters for hunting or for ritual, the words appear. Another argues that the causal arrow (6) the other way, and that having the words is what makes the distinctions available in the first place.
The debate has been (7) more heated than the evidence really warrants, which is often a sign that something else is at stake. In this case what is at stake is an old question, dressed in new clothes, about whether the limits of our language really do (8) the limits of our world.
Elige la palabra que encaja en cada hueco.
The archive that was never meant to be read
When a company folds, its paperwork is normally destroyed, and nobody (1) it a second thought. The internal memos of a failed shipping firm in Hamburg survived only because the building changed (2) three times without anyone clearing the basement.
Historians who work on such material are (3) aware of its peculiar honesty. These were documents written by people who assumed that only their colleagues would ever see them, and who therefore had no (4) to perform. The result is a record notably (5) of the self justification that fills official correspondence.
This is also, of course, what makes the material ethically awkward. The clerk who wrote a bitter note about his manager in 1954 could not have (6) that it would be quoted in a book. Some archivists take the (7) that a document created in the expectation of privacy retains some claim to it, even decades later; others regard that position as unworkable, since it would (8) most of what we know about ordinary working life.